The environmental scandal that stank to high heaven has been stunk. At least in legal terms: Recently got citizens from Michael Mueller Unterdeufstetten Post Ellwangen by the prosecutor. Under the subject "investigation of Martin Piott for water pollution," he told Attorney General Hörz with:
Müller learn: An administration official who is watching two and a half years, calmly, like shit flows into a brook makes in the eyes of a Judicial colleagues no "undue delay" guilty. Mueller asks citizens since then: his dignity average Joe citizen, he would arrive at the same polluting mess on the ropes, an equally generous bonus state prosecution be granted?
Since Müller, however, at this time untiringly believes in the rule of law, he complained to the Stuttgart Prosecutor one. Especially since he is now aware of the content an "opinion" of its mayor to District farmer has to justify itself in the Piott for his years of doing nothing attempted.
A document that, as before almost any other public document which has become known from the Wildenstein town hall, a harsh light on the thinking and actions of the incumbent raises spruce Auer Hall bosses.
More in the second part
__________________________________________________________________
* This is BM Piott now for the second time since taking office, the grace of the law in the person of Ellwanger Chief Prosecutor Hörz have been bestowed upon. This was already an investigation initiated in 2008 on suspicion of taking advantage of the Office (§ 331 StGB) is also placed "due to low debt" to the files. The occasion was an invitation to a Bundesliga game Piott by Neustädtlein Faber Cable in the VIP lounge at Munich's Allianz Arena.
** The exact time when the fox has to inform the town hall on the environmental damage is impossible to say. According to Fuchs and Muller it was in "Summer 2007". BM Piott are "end 2007". SPRUCE AUER FORUM therefore puts the period October 2007 - 18 March 2010 (repair of the damage) = ½ years based.
*** When it was first setting justification under § 170 Code of Criminal Procedure Attorney Hörz still assumed that Piott "none of the reported crimes with the can to a public prosecution required security be proved". He now possessed - unassailable - proceeding, "because of lower debt" to § 153 Code of Criminal Procedure is therefore only being second class.
madness with method (II)
madness with method (III)
See also: An environmental scandal that stinks to high heaven
In the above process, I met with a decision of 01/19/2011 the following decision:almost to the day after one year so that a process its constitutional conclusion found by a miller in his complaint 21st January 2010 as follows was founded:
The process is in accordance with Section 1 Code of Criminal Procedure 153 Listed with the approval of the court.
factors: a public interest in law enforcement is not given.
The debt must be regarded as low.
Yours .*
the construction of my house in Fichtenau-Unterdeufstetten, Bach Strasse 9, in the year 2007, I found that is at the boundary of the site by leading moat with human excrement and waste water highly loaded.
Mr Schmidt (local architect; FF) has examined the location above the river road drains checked using a video camera, and it has been found that a property located at the Dinkelsbühler been inadvertently connected in the seventies, not to the sewer system, but the procedures in this area verdohlten moat was. With the result that the waste water of this property is introduced since untreated into the Rotach.
By Mayor has Piott in knowing about the faulty connection and it cause water pollution three years ** no steps to remedy the illegal state, he has made to the willful commission of an offense under § 324 and 330 Criminal Code.Seven months required Attorney Hörz to communicate to Mueller before:
The Investigation is under 170 subsection 2, CCP set .***About oberstaatsanwaltschaftliche setting ground Müller gets difficult to ponder. The accused was "as mayor of the community" but "for the production as soon as possible a proper state of charge" that the investigation had "no evidence, however an undue delay " result (emphasis FF).
Müller learn: An administration official who is watching two and a half years, calmly, like shit flows into a brook makes in the eyes of a Judicial colleagues no "undue delay" guilty. Mueller asks citizens since then: his dignity average Joe citizen, he would arrive at the same polluting mess on the ropes, an equally generous bonus state prosecution be granted?
two and a half years with BM Piott knowledge abused as a sewer:
moat to Rotach
Since Müller, however, at this time untiringly believes in the rule of law, he complained to the Stuttgart Prosecutor one. Especially since he is now aware of the content an "opinion" of its mayor to District farmer has to justify itself in the Piott for his years of doing nothing attempted.
A document that, as before almost any other public document which has become known from the Wildenstein town hall, a harsh light on the thinking and actions of the incumbent raises spruce Auer Hall bosses.
More in the second part
__________________________________________________________________
* This is BM Piott now for the second time since taking office, the grace of the law in the person of Ellwanger Chief Prosecutor Hörz have been bestowed upon. This was already an investigation initiated in 2008 on suspicion of taking advantage of the Office (§ 331 StGB) is also placed "due to low debt" to the files. The occasion was an invitation to a Bundesliga game Piott by Neustädtlein Faber Cable in the VIP lounge at Munich's Allianz Arena.
** The exact time when the fox has to inform the town hall on the environmental damage is impossible to say. According to Fuchs and Muller it was in "Summer 2007". BM Piott are "end 2007". SPRUCE AUER FORUM therefore puts the period October 2007 - 18 March 2010 (repair of the damage) = ½ years based.
*** When it was first setting justification under § 170 Code of Criminal Procedure Attorney Hörz still assumed that Piott "none of the reported crimes with the can to a public prosecution required security be proved". He now possessed - unassailable - proceeding, "because of lower debt" to § 153 Code of Criminal Procedure is therefore only being second class.
madness with method (II)
madness with method (III)
See also: An environmental scandal that stinks to high heaven
Share with human faeces, or FF) made aware .** Citizens Mueller and Fox were the only ones who have informed the BM Piott about the misuse of Rotach as a sewer. Without it, he still probably knew nothing about it.
was a result of us using a corresponding sewer inspection video recording. . . commissioned. This took place on 21.02.2008 and found that the soil water supply of the property . . . was mistakenly connected to the single channel running in front of this property. It is, however, the surface channel, the flow in the Rotach flows as recipients. front of the property had been the building of the local sewer system in the seventies, there have always been two channels - a dirt and a surface water channel.
An explanation of why the channel investigation until five months after the then council Fuchs local builder Schmidt informed, was made, remains Piott guilty. It was not his only "undue delay" in this matter.
of us were still on 31st January, 6 February and 14 February 2008 at various times taken water samples. This resulted, in areas elevated levels that were, however, mainly with regard to the relevant ammonium-nitrogen load (NH 4) in the range of what, for example at the outlet of our large sewage treatment plants after the treatment process is also the rule.
Piotrowski "water samples" in no way correspond with the applicable regulations. "It is important," says the standard work Koppe / Stozek:
Municipal wastewater
, "next to the time of sampling the time" here are "usually 2-hour composite sample or samples for even longer time (4 -. hour composite samples, 8-hour composite samples, 24-hour composite samples attached).. . Being taken every five minutes over an hour samples, which are combined into a composite sample.
These rules apply in the field of wastewater treatment plants. To constantly fed with fresh water drainage ditches themselves they make no sense. Because there would be a sampling immediately after breaking a toilet flushing every acceptable limits, while five minutes later, possibly drinking water quality would be measured.
on 10.03.2008, we have the owner in writing of the defective drainage and to remove them, using its own (if overlong) Channel connection required under our statutes.
Piott does not know its own waste water statutes! "The central ö PEN t-lichen wastewater facilities" (emphasis added FF) determined that Section 2, "includes the portion of the service line, which runs on public transport and green spaces." The video recordings prove beyond doubt that The error connection in a public traffic area and Mrs Cresson contends the remedy was, therefore, only the local government would have. Just as well then yes, finally on 18 happened March 2010 - two and a half years after the operation Wildenstein in City Hall had become the record.
Public Transport Area:
documented the black Reparturfläche that the faulty
channel connection outside of the private plot (left) was
and therefore his disposal, as waste statutes but the community was responsible
A mayor who is not informed, a lawyer who sets the pace of the administration and frittered away three and a half doing nothing more months. Any questions for the administrative reality of the era Piott?
The matter was to monitor the local architect, however, was just stocked in 2008 due to various technical planning and control measures very strongly with work.
amazed surprise As the citizens, but the prosecutor is not "technical planning and audit functions," BM Piott have priority over the misuse of a local creek as an official plant.
on 28/04/2009, Mr. Schmidt asked the lawyer for the state of play. This indicated that the matter would be finalized by mid-2009 and therefore come back to the community will.
news from an official toll house for seven months dawns Rotach Act to himself, because the local builder has to do with supposedly more important things and a lawyer "to return to the community" wants. Overall, since becoming aware of the environmental scandal are in the wild-Steiner Hall now 19 (in words: nine ten) months now! But BM Piott with its routine nowhere near the end.
then went back on 08.05.2009 post by the attorney. . . one. He called on account of the assertion of claims for damages against the owner, the property information. By that inbox, I let myself back from the current Progress information and called for the implementation of this measure.
We learn: Even after almost two years the public has become known far worst environmental damage to the community is still not a top priority, the BM can only now and then ", from the current state of play". And reminds us to wait for it, sometimes even "the implementation" of.
then was only on 18.12.2009 again a post of the Prosecutor, which was asked to receive a copy of the invitation to the channel port for the previous owner. Such a letter is the community Fichtenau but not (any longer), because presumably the registration of the property dates from the time of the former municipality Unterdeufstetten. This was communicated to the lawyer on 21.12.2009.
The madness continues: Again, six months with completely meaningless sham maneuvers have passed, 27 months in total, since BM is Piott the daily continued unabated pollution Rotach in the picture. A German prosecutor can not shake it. 27 months? Since when is this a German officials are "undue delay"?
Click here for the third and last part
_________________________________________________________________
* Piott opinion is dated 28 January 2010 was given a copy at the same time and all local councils for information. ** quotes in original
madness with method (I)
madness with method (III)
See also: An environmental scandal that stinks to high heaven
Share
Notes BM Piott tripartite justify his years of inaction in terms of pollution Rotach District Bauer highlighted.
Piott: In the fall of 2009 came the couple. . . the local authority to. This had the top of the property. . . lying land acquired. . . After review and site visit we came to the conclusion that a structural extension would be authorized for that one project Wohnaus with garage at this location. From this fact out, things changed our assessment.
order to classify correctly Piott sudden change of direction, one must know the following:
end of 2009, citizens Müller after the foul legacy flowed past his fellow citizens still on his property, the Hall turned on water and soil conservation office. With the result that Piotrowski took years of under-the-rug-Kehrerei an abrupt end, as in Hall arrived in the decree "to eliminate the false connection immediately."
of us were still on 31st January, 6 February and 14 February 2008 at various times taken water samples. This resulted, in areas elevated levels that were, however, mainly with regard to the relevant ammonium-nitrogen load (NH 4) in the range of what, for example at the outlet of our large sewage treatment plants after the treatment process is also the rule.
Piotrowski "water samples" in no way correspond with the applicable regulations. "It is important," says the standard work Koppe / Stozek:
Municipal wastewater
, "next to the time of sampling the time" here are "usually 2-hour composite sample or samples for even longer time (4 -. hour composite samples, 8-hour composite samples, 24-hour composite samples attached).. . Being taken every five minutes over an hour samples, which are combined into a composite sample.
These rules apply in the field of wastewater treatment plants. To constantly fed with fresh water drainage ditches themselves they make no sense. Because there would be a sampling immediately after breaking a toilet flushing every acceptable limits, while five minutes later, possibly drinking water quality would be measured.
on 10.03.2008, we have the owner in writing of the defective drainage and to remove them, using its own (if overlong) Channel connection required under our statutes.
Piott does not know its own waste water statutes! "The central ö PEN t-lichen wastewater facilities" (emphasis added FF) determined that Section 2, "includes the portion of the service line, which runs on public transport and green spaces." The video recordings prove beyond doubt that The error connection in a public traffic area and Mrs Cresson contends the remedy was, therefore, only the local government would have. Just as well then yes, finally on 18 happened March 2010 - two and a half years after the operation Wildenstein in City Hall had become the record.
Public Transport Area:
documented the black Reparturfläche that the faulty
channel connection outside of the private plot (left) was
and therefore his disposal, as waste statutes but the community was responsible
By letter of 15.04.2008, the structural implementation was urged.
on 17/04/2008 volunteered woman. . . (The land owner; FF) and pointed out that should be addressed to the return of her son-building measure. . . Local architects Schmidt reminds us of the urgent amendment of this condition.
Seven months have passed since the discovery of the environmental mess in the spruce Auer Hall. Daily continue to flow freely in the human feces Rotach.
then reported at 04:08 2008 Lawyer. . . and asked for patience to resolve this matter. This inbox was during my absence (signed by the delegate in the house), so I was not initially informed that the matter is still open and will now be examined by computing the lawyer.
The matter was to monitor the local architect, however, was just stocked in 2008 due to various technical planning and control measures very strongly with work.
amazed surprise As the citizens, but the prosecutor is not "technical planning and audit functions," BM Piott have priority over the misuse of a local creek as an official plant.
on 28/04/2009, Mr. Schmidt asked the lawyer for the state of play. This indicated that the matter would be finalized by mid-2009 and therefore come back to the community will.
news from an official toll house for seven months dawns Rotach Act to himself, because the local builder has to do with supposedly more important things and a lawyer "to return to the community" wants. Overall, since becoming aware of the environmental scandal are in the wild-Steiner Hall now 19 (in words: nine ten) months now! But BM Piott with its routine nowhere near the end.
then went back on 08.05.2009 post by the attorney. . . one. He called on account of the assertion of claims for damages against the owner, the property information. By that inbox, I let myself back from the current Progress information and called for the implementation of this measure.
We learn: Even after almost two years the public has become known far worst environmental damage to the community is still not a top priority, the BM can only now and then ", from the current state of play". And reminds us to wait for it, sometimes even "the implementation" of.
then was only on 18.12.2009 again a post of the Prosecutor, which was asked to receive a copy of the invitation to the channel port for the previous owner. Such a letter is the community Fichtenau but not (any longer), because presumably the registration of the property dates from the time of the former municipality Unterdeufstetten. This was communicated to the lawyer on 21.12.2009.
The madness continues: Again, six months with completely meaningless sham maneuvers have passed, 27 months in total, since BM is Piott the daily continued unabated pollution Rotach in the picture. A German prosecutor can not shake it. 27 months? Since when is this a German officials are "undue delay"?
Click here for the third and last part
_________________________________________________________________
* Piott opinion is dated 28 January 2010 was given a copy at the same time and all local councils for information. ** quotes in original
madness with method (I)
madness with method (III)
See also: An environmental scandal that stinks to high heaven
Share
Notes BM Piott tripartite justify his years of inaction in terms of pollution Rotach District Bauer highlighted.
Piott: In the fall of 2009 came the couple. . . the local authority to. This had the top of the property. . . lying land acquired. . . After review and site visit we came to the conclusion that a structural extension would be authorized for that one project Wohnaus with garage at this location. From this fact out, things changed our assessment.
order to classify correctly Piott sudden change of direction, one must know the following:
end of 2009, citizens Müller after the foul legacy flowed past his fellow citizens still on his property, the Hall turned on water and soil conservation office. With the result that Piotrowski took years of under-the-rug-Kehrerei an abrupt end, as in Hall arrived in the decree "to eliminate the false connection immediately."
going to do now was expensive in the wild-Steiner Hall. Saw himself but his boss suddenly faced with the embarrassing question: how to explain 'I God, the world, the land and the council, that I matter in this shitty two years have not progressed an inch? On best way I simply pass the responsibility and say that "we have been around for quite some time with the competent and full content of informed parent bodies in contact in order to remedy this situation .* may Stupid way, however, the competent Haller water pollution control officials partout remember a fully substantive information ". The process was known to us by mid-December, not 2009"
To ensure that the case to avoid the dehydration are carried on two private (over-) long main ports would have to, we have decided to establish a public channel piece. We would collect contributions, if you can negotiate an additional contribution of the residents. We have just a sum in the 2010 budget would set and implement the measure. Of course, only when the weather permits and the budget from the critical, but is approved for the community Fichtenau 2010 even more unbearable financial environment.
Office agrees with this gibberish to nothing. For the failed connected property has always been a public and to accidental disconnection from the yard of the community and properly utilized sewer available. The following posts were already paid for it. And that is situated above land adjacent to the couple, predictably, was until now not yet built connected to the sewerage system.
The cause of the spruce Auer Environmental scandal:
from the building improperly connected private sewer line (red tube, right),
of municipal storm sewer (gray tube left)
also Piotrowski years of legal wrangling for recovery of alleged damages turned out to be what he was there from the beginning: a mere shadow-boxing. All costs of repairing the wrong port - 8000 € were reserved for the 2010 budget - was borne by the municipal treasury, meaning the tax-and duty-paid Spruce Auer citizens.
As BM Piott then on 18 March 2010 finally can advance the excavator, walked two and a half into the country. Two and a half years since the spruce Auer were citizens Fuchs and Muller met their civic responsibility and the Wildenstein City Hall one of the worst environmental damage to the town history had been recorded.
______________________________________________________________
* Quoted from BM of 19 Piott Email January 2010 SPRUCE AUER FORUM
Share
The council then decided unanimously
we read in the minutes , the transport costs of the nursery Buskinder centipedes, Fichtenau-Wildenstein will be no increase to 01.09.2009. Moreover, the agenda item was postponed to devising an overall concept on opportunities for families in the community Fichtenau.
Office agrees with this gibberish to nothing. For the failed connected property has always been a public and to accidental disconnection from the yard of the community and properly utilized sewer available. The following posts were already paid for it. And that is situated above land adjacent to the couple, predictably, was until now not yet built connected to the sewerage system.
The cause of the spruce Auer Environmental scandal:
from the building improperly connected private sewer line (red tube, right),
of municipal storm sewer (gray tube left)
also Piotrowski years of legal wrangling for recovery of alleged damages turned out to be what he was there from the beginning: a mere shadow-boxing. All costs of repairing the wrong port - 8000 € were reserved for the 2010 budget - was borne by the municipal treasury, meaning the tax-and duty-paid Spruce Auer citizens.
As BM Piott then on 18 March 2010 finally can advance the excavator, walked two and a half into the country. Two and a half years since the spruce Auer were citizens Fuchs and Muller met their civic responsibility and the Wildenstein City Hall one of the worst environmental damage to the town history had been recorded.
______________________________________________________________
* Quoted from BM of 19 Piott Email January 2010 SPRUCE AUER FORUM
reaction of the Bauer-Office madness with method (I)
madness with method (II)
See also: An environmental scandal that stinks to high heaven
Share
adopted it because of all the between-emplaced or announcements, projects and plans such proportions that one wonders how he actually manages to still zuzukriegen the door. One of the many utensils that the Town Hall for years to head back and pushed in, the so-called
family policy concept of community . Now and then he pulls out there, waving it around a bit to get it then locked away carefully.
So too in the last council meeting, was brought into the BM once again his favorite toy: the tax and fee screw. Kindergarten Centipedes, Fichtenau-Wildenstein, here adapted transport costs
had let it set in point 6 on the agenda. Apparently unaware that he would be so strident in its councils, all alarm bells after an identical advance their leader had a shot blocked before joining forces.
what happened in the meeting on 14 September 2009, in the agenda under item 6 be read word for word the same thing could (!):
kindergarten centipedes, Fichtenau-Wildenstein, here adapted transport costs And even then Meeting attendees felt unable to trust their eyes on as the man Vorstandsstisch since it came to voting, went up at once stretched right hand - with a poker face to face against his own request to vote. what happened in the meeting on 14 September 2009, in the agenda under item 6 be read word for word the same thing could (!):
The council then decided unanimously
we read in the minutes , the transport costs of the nursery Buskinder centipedes, Fichtenau-Wildenstein will be no increase to 01.09.2009. Moreover, the agenda item was postponed to devising an overall concept on opportunities for families in the community Fichtenau.
Postponed? Experienced meeting attendees Know that caution is advised when this term appears. For what "postponed" in the era Piott is that not only ends up on his long bank promptly, it is also - if no one asks - usually never reappeared. The fate of the family policy concept of community is a textbook example of this automatism. Just two months after Piott elegant maneuvers, we read the minutes of the November 2009 meeting , had been "asked the council for the progress of the family policy concept (emphasis in original, FF). Piotrowski's most beautiful waterfall in language formulated answer should be allowed to dissolve on the tongue:
months are over, passes a year. No collector of possible content and issues to be seen, no labor group in question, no citizen is to his Opinion asked, no concrete decision paper sees the light of day. And our Schultes would not 14 months later, at the first meeting of 2011, succumbed to the temptation, in performance of its own personal idea of a family policy concept of community the parents of the Wildenstein centipede Children again in the pocket too long *, we can be sure it would be for all time been laid to rest.
As it looked like his attempt to increase the monthly cost of transport from 17 to 22 €, on the supposedly short memory of his parish councils over, but still push through, a handle to the wasp nest.
Councillor Wagemann (
woman list): "The nursery school fees have risen steadily since 2006. I therefore propose to reject the application "
council Trampert ( One for All
):". Rely on the bus that would be a social disadvantage of the parents, their children. I refuse not to oppose the application "
council Schenk (CDU
Association):". We have decided in 2009 to waive the increase from 17 to then 21 €. This decision remains valid. If you want to now increased to 22 €, we are talking thus of an increase of one and five euros. Right, "
council rim ( CDU Association
):" The item was postponed, and we make a family-policy blueprint or we decide here today to increase transportation costs, and in 14 days is then again increasing. Kindergarten total contributions to the agenda "
council Bleicher (
One for All ):". I propose, the issue of family policy conception of community to put on the agenda of the next two meetings " council Wagner ( one for all
):". I make a point of order: the increase was postponed "
And then it happens again. : As the chairman of the meeting to vote on the Wagnerian application allows projecting his rights in counting the votes for the most up.
________________________________________________________________ * To whopping 23.4 percent, nearly a quarter, was the only child rule set in kindergarten centipedes on BM Piott operation since 2006 increased in five stages, which lies within West German
ranking somewhere between Osnabrück and shameful in a 81st Schwerin Place (out of 100 surveyed municipalities).
Update 27 February 2011
Last message by Piotrowski
Langer Bank
first time in his tenure, the council shall meet tomorrow to a new session without the report was published the previous . See also: Rewarded vacancies
Share
As it looked like his attempt to increase the monthly cost of transport from 17 to 22 €, on the supposedly short memory of his parish councils over, but still push through, a handle to the wasp nest.
Councillor Wagemann (
woman list): "The nursery school fees have risen steadily since 2006. I therefore propose to reject the application "
council Trampert ( One for All
):". Rely on the bus that would be a social disadvantage of the parents, their children. I refuse not to oppose the application "
council Schenk (CDU
Association):". We have decided in 2009 to waive the increase from 17 to then 21 €. This decision remains valid. If you want to now increased to 22 €, we are talking thus of an increase of one and five euros. Right, "
council rim ( CDU Association
):" The item was postponed, and we make a family-policy blueprint or we decide here today to increase transportation costs, and in 14 days is then again increasing. Kindergarten total contributions to the agenda "
council Bleicher (
One for All ):". I propose, the issue of family policy conception of community to put on the agenda of the next two meetings " council Wagner ( one for all
):". I make a point of order: the increase was postponed "
And then it happens again. : As the chairman of the meeting to vote on the Wagnerian application allows projecting his rights in counting the votes for the most up.
________________________________________________________________ * To whopping 23.4 percent, nearly a quarter, was the only child rule set in kindergarten centipedes on BM Piott operation since 2006 increased in five stages, which lies within West German
ranking somewhere between Osnabrück and shameful in a 81st Schwerin Place (out of 100 surveyed municipalities).
Update 27 February 2011
Last message by Piotrowski
Langer Bank
first time in his tenure, the council shall meet tomorrow to a new session without the report was published the previous . See also: Rewarded vacancies
Share
0 comments:
Post a Comment